By Ryan Smith and Sigurd Arild
The current state of Jungian typology is such that Jungian concepts that do not directly relate to type are sometimes thrown around to spice up people’s experience and presentation of typology. In particular, Jung’s idea of archetypes is often mentioned in order to complement people’s understanding of type. However, the general understanding of these lines of thought appears to be poor and/or wrong.
For example, Jungian functions are sometimes referred to as archetypes, just as four-letter type codes are sometimes referred to as archetypes. These are both erroneous views. ...
- This article requires site membership. If you are already a member, click here to log in. If you are not a member, go here to create your account and become a member of the IDR Labs community today.