Skip to main content

Music Taste Test (S/E)

The systemizing/empathizing (S/E) dichotomy is a psychological framework developed by Simon Baron-Cohen to explain differences in cognitive styles, particularly in the context of autism. Systemizing involves analyzing and understanding systems, rules, and patterns, while empathizing focuses on understanding emotions and social interactions.

David M. Greenberg and colleagues at the University of Cambridge investigated how differences in musical tastes between individuals align with the empathizing-systemizing (E-S) theory.

What does your S/E score reveal about your taste in music? To take the test, indicate your input below.

Question 1 of 20

I find it difficult to understand how other people are feeling.

Disagree
Agree

NEXT

The (S/E) Test was developed by IDRlabs on the basis of research from Cambridge University.

The Systemizing/Empathizing (S/E) dichotomy is a psychological theory developed by Simon Baron-Cohen that posits two cognitive styles people may lean toward: systemizing, which refers to the drive to analyze and understand systems, and empathizing, which involves understanding and responding to the emotions and thoughts of others. While these tendencies are seen in varying degrees in all individuals, they can offer valuable insights when applied to activities like music, which uniquely blends both technical and emotional elements.

Systemizing in Music

Systemizing in the context of music involves the focus on the structures, rules, and patterns that govern musical composition and performance. This aspect is akin to the technical side of music: analyzing its underlying systems, like scales, chords, rhythms, and forms. For someone who leans more toward systemizing, music may be seen as a structured framework of sounds that interact according to specific rules.

For example, composers and theorists often approach music from a systemizing perspective, seeking to understand how notes relate to one another in a harmonic framework or how rhythm can be divided and manipulated to create complex time signatures. They may explore the mathematical relationships between tones in a scale or delve into the logic of counterpoint in classical music. For these individuals, the satisfaction in music comes from mastering the intricate systems that allow them to predict, manipulate, and control sound in a way that aligns with established rules or innovates within them.

This systemizing tendency is also evident in the creation of music software and technologies. Programming algorithms to compose music, generating synthesized sound based on waveforms, or creating new digital instruments are all examples of how systemizing interacts with music on a technical level. The precision and predictability of these systems allow musicians and engineers to generate, alter, or enhance music with technological tools, applying a systematic mindset to sound design.

Empathizing in Music

On the other hand, empathizing in music emphasizes emotional connection and expression. Empathizers are more focused on the emotional and social aspects of music—how it makes people feel, how it communicates emotions, and how it fosters connection between individuals.

Empathy plays a significant role in both the creation and experience of music. For performers, it may involve interpreting a piece of music in a way that conveys specific emotions or ideas, understanding how dynamics, phrasing, and tempo can evoke different responses in the audience. The emotional nuance behind each note or phrase is not merely technical but also deeply tied to a sense of shared experience between the performer and listener.

Listeners who are more empathizing may focus on how music resonates with them emotionally or on how it mirrors personal or collective experiences. They might connect a song to a particular memory or mood and see music as a form of emotional communication. This empathic engagement is often what makes music such a universal language, transcending cultural and linguistic barriers by appealing to shared human emotions.

In genres like blues, jazz, or even folk, where personal storytelling and emotion play central roles, empathizing is key. The ability of a musician to "feel" the music and convey that feeling to others is often more important than technical proficiency. Improvisation in jazz, for example, can be seen as a dialog between musicians, where emotional responses guide the flow of the performance.

The Interplay of Systemizing and Empathizing in Music

While systemizing and empathizing may seem like opposing modes of thought, in music they often complement each other. A well-rounded musician, for instance, may have strong systemizing skills, allowing them to master technique and theory, but they must also possess empathizing abilities to imbue their performances with emotion and connect with audiences.

Even within specific roles, the dichotomy can shift. A composer may begin by systemizing—constructing a piece according to musical theory—but later switch to an empathizing mode to ensure the work evokes the intended emotional response. Similarly, a performer might rely on systemizing when mastering difficult technical passages but shift to an empathizing approach when interpreting the emotional depth of the piece.

In conclusion, the systemizing/empathizing dichotomy provides a rich framework for understanding different cognitive approaches to music. While systemizers may be drawn to the structural complexities of music, empathizers may be more attuned to its emotional impact. Together, these two cognitive styles work in concert, allowing music to be both technically sophisticated and emotionally powerful.

Prior to using our free online test, please note that the results are provided "as-is", for free, and should not be construed as providing professional or certified advice of any kind. For more on our online quiz, please consult our Terms of Service.

Why Use This Test?

1. Free. The systemizing/empathizing (S/E) Music Taste Test is provided to you free of charge.

2. Statistical controls. Test scores are logged into an anonymized database. Statistical analysis of the test is conducted to ensure maximum accuracy and validity of the test scores.

3. Made by professionals. The present test has been made with the input of people who work professionally in psychology and individual differences research.