Nietzschean Morality Test

This test is designed to give you a chance to reflect on your personal moral outlook through the lens of one of philosophy’s most famous dichotomies: master morality versus slave morality. These terms originate from the work of Friedrich Nietzsche, a 19th-century philosopher who challenged traditional ideas about good and evil, right and wrong. Nietzsche’s insight was that what counts as “moral” depends heavily on who is defining it and that different groups or types of people create moral systems that serve their own interests and ways of life.

The test presents 20 statements—10 reflecting attitudes associated with what Nietzsche called “master morality” and 10 with “slave morality.” By rating how much you agree or disagree with each statement, you can get a sense of where your values tend to align. It’s important to remember that these categories are not meant to be labels for people but frameworks for understanding different perspectives on morality.

Master morality, as Nietzsche described it, is often linked to those who are strong, creative, and self-affirming. It emphasizes qualities like power, nobility, and independence. People who resonate with master morality might see themselves as creators of their own values, celebrating strength, ambition, and courage. In this framework, what is “good” is what enhances life and asserts power, while “bad” is what is weak or limiting.

Slave morality, on the other hand, is traditionally associated with the weaker or oppressed groups who redefine values in terms of humility, kindness, and empathy. Nietzsche argued that this morality arose as a reaction to the masters’ dominance. Rather than celebrating power, slave morality finds virtue in qualities that promote community, compassion, and fairness. What is “good” here is what protects the vulnerable and fosters cooperation.

It’s worth noting that Nietzsche’s use of the word “slave” can be unsettling or controversial. The term reflects historical and philosophical concepts but does not intend to demean anyone. Many find this label biased or problematic because it seems to privilege strength over empathy or because it may overlook the complexities of moral development and social justice. This test acknowledges those concerns and encourages users to approach the categories as tools for reflection, not judgment.

By engaging with the test, you might discover nuances in your own moral thinking. Do you prioritize independence and self-mastery, or do you feel more aligned with empathy and communal support? Perhaps you find yourself somewhere in between or identifying with different values depending on the situation. This complexity is normal and expected.

The test can also serve as a conversation starter or a way to explore philosophical ideas in a practical way. Whether you’re a student of philosophy, someone interested in self-knowledge, or simply curious about how moral values shape human behavior, this tool offers an accessible way to engage with Nietzsche’s provocative ideas.

Remember, no single test can capture the full depth of your moral character. Morality is deeply personal and shaped by culture, experience, and reflection. The goal here is to offer insight, provoke thought, and help you understand different dimensions of value creation.

If you’re interested in learning more about Nietzsche’s philosophy, consider reading his works, such as On the Genealogy of Morals or Beyond Good and Evil. These texts explore the origins and implications of master and slave moralities in much greater detail and can enrich your understanding of this test’s foundation.

In sum, this test is an invitation to explore, to question, and to reflect on what guides your sense of right and wrong. It’s a tool to help you better understand yourself—and perhaps, the complex moral landscape we all navigate.