Political Instincts Test

The Political Instincts Test was created based on a theory by researcher Sebastian Jensen. This site is not affiliated with Jensen.

Hierarchy: The political instinct for hierarchy values structure and order in society, believing that some individuals or groups are better suited to lead or make decisions based on expertise, experience, or ability. This instinct sees a clear division of roles as essential for stability, efficiency, and progress. People who favor hierarchy tend to respect authority and tradition, arguing that a well-defined social structure creates unity and reduces conflict. Both left-leaning and right-leaning thinkers might see hierarchy as necessary for achieving their goals effectively.

Authority: The instinct for authority emphasizes the importance of strong leadership and centralized control to maintain social order and address complex issues. It reflects a belief that certain figures or institutions must have the power to enforce rules and ensure compliance to prevent chaos. Those with this instinct, on both the left and right, may believe that effective governance depends on respecting and trusting leaders to guide society, especially during crises. Strong authority is seen as necessary for security and collective success.

Lindy: The lindy instinct values practices, traditions, and ideas that have withstood the test of time. It reflects a belief that if something has lasted, it must possess enduring wisdom or utility. Lindy thinkers across the political spectrum view the past as a source of insight for present challenges, believing that innovation should be approached cautiously. They tend to resist sudden, unproven changes, favoring gradual improvement. Whether left or right, those with this instinct see time-tested methods as reliable and stabilizing for society.

Vetocratic: The vetocratic instinct values slow, deliberate decision-making, where consensus is prioritized to minimize risks. It reflects a belief that decisions should be well-considered and inclusive of multiple viewpoints to prevent hasty or dangerous outcomes. Individuals with this instinct, from both left and right, might argue that rushing into action can lead to instability and poor results. Vetocratic thinkers prioritize collaboration and careful planning to ensure long-term success, valuing the collective wisdom of various stakeholders over rapid action.

Sacred: The sacred instinct focuses on the belief that certain values, ideals, or institutions are inviolable and must be protected at all costs. This instinct leads people to hold particular aspects of society, such as justice, freedom, or the environment, as non-negotiable. Both left-leaning and right-leaning individuals can share this instinct, as it applies to deeply held convictions that define their moral or political identity. Defending what is "sacred" involves prioritizing these principles above compromise or pragmatism.

Revolutionary: The revolutionary instinct is driven by a desire for radical change, rejecting the status quo in favor of transformative action. Those with this instinct see the existing system as deeply flawed or oppressive, requiring bold, often disruptive efforts to create a better society. Both left- and right-wing individuals can possess revolutionary instincts, as it involves challenging established norms and advocating for new structures. Revolutionary thinkers prioritize vision and action over gradual reform, believing that deep change is necessary to achieve justice or progress.

This test cannot be used to provide clinical assessments or an accurate evaluation of your features. Clinical assessments should always be done in cooperation with a mental health professional. For more information about any of our online tests and quizzes, please consult our Terms of Service.